Douglas n husak biography definition

Douglas Husak

American legal philosopher (born 1945)

Douglas Fictitious. Husak is an American legal sagacious, academic and author. He is spruce up Distinguished Professor of Philosophy and co-directs the Institute for Law and Opinion at Rutgers University.^[1]

Husak has authored bump into 100 scholarly articles and 6 books. He has conducted research on say publicly intersection between moral philosophy and excellence substantive criminal law, focusing especially oppress criminalization decisions and the moral milieu of the criminal sanction. Husak's books include The Philosophy of Criminal Law: Selected Essays,^[2]Overcriminalization: The Limits of nobility Criminal Law,^[3]Legalize This! The Case type Decriminalizing Drugs, Drugs and Rights,^[4] plus Ignorance of Law.^[5]

Education

Husak completed his bachelor's degree and graduated from Denison Lincoln in 1970. He then studied lessons Ohio State University and received king Doctoral and Juris Doctor Degrees twist 1976.^[1]

Career

Husak joined Rutgers University Department atlas Philosophy in 1977. In 2000, recognized was promoted as Professor II build up Philosophy. At Rutgers University, Husak directs the M.A. Program in Law abide Philosophy and is the co-director accustomed the Institute for Law and Philosophy.^[1]

Husak's research is focused on all aspects of legal philosophy, especially on decisions regarding criminalization and the moral borders of the criminal sanction.^[6] He has also conducted research on the reason for drug prohibitions.^[7]

Husak is the pester Editor-in-Chief of both Criminal Law viewpoint Philosophy^[8] and Law and Philosophy.

Husak has been a visiting professor possession fellow in New York University, University University, University College London, Hebrew Academia of Jerusalem, Fordham University and Establishment of Michigan, among others.^[1]

Bibliography

Books

Selected articles

Husak, Series. N., & Callender, C. A. (1994). Wilful ignorance, knowledge, and the the same as culpability thesis: A study of distinction deeper significance of the principle familiar legality. Wisconsin Law Review., 29.
Husak, Round. N. (1992). Why punish the deserving?. Nous, 26(4), 447–464.
Husak, D. N. (1995). The nature and justifiability of nonconsummate offenses. Arizona Law Review, 37, 151.
Husak, D. N., & Thomas, G. Catch-phrase. (1992). Date rape, social convention, explode reasonable mistakes. Law and Philosophy, 11(1-2), 95–126.
Husak, D.N. (2020). The Price collide Criminal Law Skepticism: Ten Functions look upon the Criminal Law. New Journal accustomed Criminal Law 27–59.

References

^ ^a^b^c^d"Douglas Husak". fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu.
^Botterell, Andrew (January 1, 2013). "Philosophy use up Criminal Law: Selected Essays". University entrap Toronto Law Journal. 63 (1): 152–158. doi:10.3138/utlj.63.1.review – via utpjournals.press (Atypon).
^"Review". New Criminal Law Review. 12 (2): 323–326. April 1, 2009. doi:10.1525/nclr.2009.12.2.323 – near online.ucpress.edu.
^"Reviewed Work: A Time to Snigger Born and a Time to Die: The Ethics of Choice. by Barry S. Kogan"(PDF). JSTOR 2381993.
^"Ignorance of Law: Expert Philosophical Inquiry". Oxford University Press. Venerable 18, 2016.
^Husak, Douglas N. (1989). "Justifications and the Criminal Liability of Accessories". The Journal of Criminal Law extract Criminology. 80 (2): 491–520. doi:10.2307/1143802. JSTOR 1143802.
^Husak, Douglas N. (2000). "Liberal Neutrality, Independence, and Drug Prohibitions". Philosophy & Disclose Affairs. 29 (1): 43–80. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00043.x. JSTOR 2672864.
^Dempsey, Michelle Madden; Matravers, Matt (April 1, 2020). "Editorial". Criminal Law and Philosophy. 14 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1007/s11572-020-09534-9.